By Dr Jodie Abramovitch
The current polio vaccine was developed by Albert Sabin in 1961 and is a live-attenuated, orally administered vaccine (OPV). Live-attenuated means that the polio virus is alive but unable to cause disease. In settings with high childhood mortality, the OPV is believed to have non-specific effects that allows for protection against other childhood infections such as paralytic poliomyelitis (also known as infantile paralysis caused by the polio virus), tuberculosis and measles. This non-specific protection is thought to be able to reduce mortality to infectious diseases, particularly in childhood, by up to 17%. The significance of this protection is controversial.
To reduce the incidence of poliomyelitis
which is around 75 cases worldwide per year, the World Health Organisation
(WHO) has recommended the OPV be replaced by an inactivated form (IPV) of the
polio virus. Inactivated means the virus used in the vaccine is dead.
The current polio vaccine was developed by Albert Sabin in 1961 and is a live-attenuated, orally administered vaccine (OPV). Live-attenuated means that the polio virus is alive but unable to cause disease. In settings with high childhood mortality, the OPV is believed to have non-specific effects that allows for protection against other childhood infections such as paralytic poliomyelitis (also known as infantile paralysis caused by the polio virus), tuberculosis and measles. This non-specific protection is thought to be able to reduce mortality to infectious diseases, particularly in childhood, by up to 17%. The significance of this protection is controversial.
Professor Magda Plebanski |
In a recent correspondence published in The Lancet, a group of
physicians and scientists, including Professor Magdalena Plebanski from the
Department of Immunology and Pathology, voiced their concern at a potential
change to the form of the current polio vaccine from OPV to IPV. It was noted
that previous evidence suggests that the IPV does not confer the same
non-specific protection as the OPV. Therefore, the IPV may be associated with
an increase in childhood mortality (caused by a range of different infectious
diseases). The authors postulated that for every case of poliomyelitis that is
reduced by the IPV about 4000 extra deaths due to other infectious diseases (resulting in 300 000 additional deaths each year) may
occur that could have been prevented by the OPV.
The authors of this correspondence concluded by urging the WHO
to conduct randomised trials of the two different forms of polio vaccine before
phasing out the OPV. This would allow for a better understanding of the non-specific
protection that each of the polio vaccines provides against other infectious
diseases. The results of these trials would inform whether the IPV leads to a
higher infectious disease mortality overall when compared to the OPV, as well
as whether the OPV and IPV may be administered alongside one another in
children to prevent poliomyelitis and keep infectious disease mortality low.
Reference: Fish EN, Flanagan KL, Furman D, Klein SL, Kollmann TR, Jeppesen DL, Levy O, Marchant A, Namachivayam S, Netea MG, Plebanski M,Rowland-Jones SL, Selin LK, Shann F, Whittle HC. Changing oral vaccine to inactivated polio vaccine might increase mortality. Lancet. 2016 Mar; 387:1054-5.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00661-9.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00661-9.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thankyou for your comment. We moderate all messages and may take a little time to review your comment. Please email inquiries to ccs.comms@monash.edu.